<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chapter In The Bible That Appears Twice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/</link>
	<description>Some thoughts on VC, some on tech, and some on other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne Ryan</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marianne Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-4261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a lot of the problems that the creators of the JEDP system didn’t consider were the problems that the translators created, not the original author(s) of the Bible. For instance, the Jews refuse to even speak YHWH’s name because they feel it would be sacriligeous. Which is completely unbiblical. So the translators of the KJV replaced YHWH with the LORD (all caps so you know it once said YHWH). There are other problems that the original translators created beside this. People believe the apostles changed the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday (which is completely false) because of a faulty translation in Romans 20:7. You have to understand about the Feasts, and also the italizied words in the KJV, to understand the translation correctly, and why it’s faulty. But, a whole doctrine is created on this faulty translation. Christians believe the verse says “And on the first day of the week…”, when actually it should say “And on the first of the weeks…” My KJV Bible has the word “day” in italics, which means the word wasn’t originally there. The translators added it, and they shouldn’t have. Obviously, the translators weren’t familiar with the Feasts. It’s talking about counting the first sabbath of the feast. (They had to count to 49 Sabbaths, then the next sabbath, the 50th, another Feast would begin). You would never understand this if you weren’t familiar with italizied words in the KJV, and also the Lord’s Feasts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of the problems that the creators of the JEDP system didn’t consider were the problems that the translators created, not the original author(s) of the Bible. For instance, the Jews refuse to even speak YHWH’s name because they feel it would be sacriligeous. Which is completely unbiblical. So the translators of the KJV replaced YHWH with the LORD (all caps so you know it once said YHWH). There are other problems that the original translators created beside this. People believe the apostles changed the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday (which is completely false) because of a faulty translation in Romans 20:7. You have to understand about the Feasts, and also the italizied words in the KJV, to understand the translation correctly, and why it’s faulty. But, a whole doctrine is created on this faulty translation. Christians believe the verse says “And on the first day of the week…”, when actually it should say “And on the first of the weeks…” My KJV Bible has the word “day” in italics, which means the word wasn’t originally there. The translators added it, and they shouldn’t have. Obviously, the translators weren’t familiar with the Feasts. It’s talking about counting the first sabbath of the feast. (They had to count to 49 Sabbaths, then the next sabbath, the 50th, another Feast would begin). You would never understand this if you weren’t familiar with italizied words in the KJV, and also the Lord’s Feasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 Blog In Review &#171; Thinking About Thinking</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2010 Blog In Review &#171; Thinking About Thinking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 13:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-3134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Chapter In The Bible That Appears Twice February 2010 16 comments [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Chapter In The Bible That Appears Twice February 2010 16 comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coby</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[coby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-2723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[psalm 18    2 samuel 22]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>psalm 18    2 samuel 22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tresa Nishihara</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tresa Nishihara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-2213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a little thank you comment for the time you put into making this article, not bad at all]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little thank you comment for the time you put into making this article, not bad at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds everyone here as forgotten that the bible was not written in English. It was translated to English - By Men, and their own interpretations.

It&#039;s not surprising to me in the least that a section appears twice in two different places or that it was translated slightly differently in each place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds everyone here as forgotten that the bible was not written in English. It was translated to English &#8211; By Men, and their own interpretations.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surprising to me in the least that a section appears twice in two different places or that it was translated slightly differently in each place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#8212; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts &#8212; WordPress.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  The Chapter In The Bible That Appears Twice This qualifies in the camp of &#8211; you learn something new every day. I learned yesterday that there are two [...] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  The Chapter In The Bible That Appears Twice This qualifies in the camp of &ndash; you learn something new every day. I learned yesterday that there are two [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I was endlessly copying bibles BY HAND all day I&#039;d probably screw up which one was #14 and which one was #53 sometime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was endlessly copying bibles BY HAND all day I&#8217;d probably screw up which one was #14 and which one was #53 sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pav</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 Kings19 and Isaiah 37 are (almost) identical too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 Kings19 and Isaiah 37 are (almost) identical too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daelstorm</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daelstorm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the word &quot;Yahweh&quot; (translated as &quot;the LORD&quot;) in Chapter 14 replaces the &quot;Elohim&quot; (translated as &quot;God&quot;) in Chapter 53, so the JPED theory that the Jewish religion was being revised (albeit inefficiently) does explain why the verses differ only by a few words. If you ignore the Elohim/Yahweh swapouts, the two chapters only differ by about a dozen words in the Hebrew.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the word &#8220;Yahweh&#8221; (translated as &#8220;the LORD&#8221;) in Chapter 14 replaces the &#8220;Elohim&#8221; (translated as &#8220;God&#8221;) in Chapter 53, so the JPED theory that the Jewish religion was being revised (albeit inefficiently) does explain why the verses differ only by a few words. If you ignore the Elohim/Yahweh swapouts, the two chapters only differ by about a dozen words in the Hebrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://larrycheng.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrycheng.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/the-chapter-in-the-bible-that-appears-twice/#comment-1675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God inspired the writers to put it in there twice for emphasis, and also to see how long it would take for any of us to catch it. 

:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God inspired the writers to put it in there twice for emphasis, and also to see how long it would take for any of us to catch it.<br />
 <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

